Festus Keyamo withdraws from Stephanie Otobo Vs Apostle Suleman case

The controversial Canada based Stephanie Otobo is in the news again, this time her lawyer, Mr. Festus Keyamo (SAN) has withdrawn from her case as counsel.
The case has to do with s*x scandal between Ms Otobo and Apostle Johnson Suleman of Omega Fire Ministries in which the latter accused the Apostle of s*xual perversion.
The saga which broke in March last year saw the man of God firing back and suing Otobo and an online medium, one billion Naira each, at the Ikeja high court in Lagos, Nigeria.
But, Otobo who then had the legal services of her counsel and lawyer, Festus Keyamo, had continued to insist that indeed, an illicit affair took place between her and the fiery preacher. She had also released several videos in the process to that respect.

READ ALSO: What is an Alfa, a Pastor doing with human parts in Ibadan? Read for more details

But, after almost a year of accusations and counter accusations, a shocked Nigeria woke up on Saturday, January 27th, to view a widely circulated online video where Otobo had gone to Apostle Suleman’s church in Auchi during the monthly Fire Night programme (an all night vigil programme) on Friday night of January 26th to confess before the mammoth crowd that she was used by “some powerful politicians and men of God” to destroy the character and reputation of Apostle Suleman.
Otobo had, in the video, knelt down before the wife of Apostle Suleman, weeping profusely and pleading for forgiveness.
But since her confession and plea for forgiveness, Otobo claims her sponsors, and her lawyer, Keyamo, made frantic efforts, including email and text messages now in the custody of the fiery preachers’ team to persuade her to reverse her confession.

READ ALSO: NEW UPDATE: “I was not lured, kidnapped, forced to confess” – Stephanie Otobo—More revelations here

She said part of such desperate efforts by her sponsors was the video of July 2017 released by an online medium (not Tribune) where she claimed she was under pressure by Apostle Suleman to confess.
But countering the old video immediately after its release, Otobo, in her hideout in Lagos, released a new video to debunk the former as carried by the online medium.
Otobo added that the said video which was shot more than six months before her public confession at Apostle Suleman”s church was one of the tactics her sponsors used to goad her on what she described as the path of lies and falsehood.
She reiterated that her confession at Apostle Suleman”s church was true and voluntarily done to set her troubled mind free.
To strengthen her resolve to free her mind from those she said were her manipulators, she has deposed to an Affidavit of Disclaimer, stating, interalia, that the statement of defence filed at Ikeja high court, purportedly on her behalf by her lawyer was untrue.

READ ALSO: Stephanie Otobo confesses she was paid to pull down Apostle Johnson Suleman – Read reactions from the people

According to Otobo, the statement and photographs exhibited in the court processes did not emanate from her.
She claimed, “I was invited to my lawyer’s chambers to sign a bundle of documents but when I asked what the bundle of documents were meant for, I was deceived and told they were to be sent to the Nigeria Police to release my cell phone seized from me in March 2017 when I was arrested by the Police for blackmail and extortion, following the complaint of Apostle Suleman.”
She said “with my affidavit of disclaimer, my lawyer quickly ran to Ikeja high court where the civil suit filed by Apostle Suleman against me came up for hearing, seeking to withdraw as my counsel.
“In the said letter, my lawyer’s chambers surprisingly admitted that they never knew any known address of their client (Stephanie Otobo) despite haven defended me so profusely.”

READ ALSO: FUNNY VIDEO: Watch a greater tomorrow Electrical Engineer

Reacting to the Otobo vs Apostle Suleman’s case, a legal practitioner, Barrister Moses Undogwe said, “The whole thing appears more like a well orchestrated blackmail, calculated to inflict injury on the accused. The most disgusting aspect of it all is the online video clips. It is a case of blackmail.”
A legal luminary who submitted that, in keeping with the ethics of the legal profession, a counsel is not supposed to conduct media trial.
Another legal luminary however submitted that Keyamo should have used an eagle-eyed legal instinct to detect the falsehood in the whole case before taking up the case, adding that, in keeping with the ethics of the legal profession, a counsel is not supposed to conduct media trial.

www.sojworld.com (c) February 10, 2018