INEC appeals against Osun Tribunal Judgement on over-voting

READ ALSO:. Osun PDP Commends INEC for Appealing Tribunal Judgement on over-voting

The Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) has appealed against the Election Petition Tribunal Judgement that nullified the victory of Osun State Governor, Ademola Adeleke, in the July 16 governorship poll.

In the Notice of Appeal dated 30th January 2023, filed before the Court of Appeal, Akure Division, obtained in Osogbo on Wednesday, the commission listed 44 grounds of appeal and asked the court, to set aside the judgement of the Tribunal.

The appellant also asked the court to dismiss the petition filed by All Progressives Congress and its candidate at the poll, Adegboyega Oyetola, for lacking in merit.

A Tribunal panel led by Justice Tertsea Kume had nullified Adeleke’s victory and declared Oyetola as the duly elected governor at the poll in its judgement of January 27, 2023.

READ ALSO:. Osun Police arrests Girlfriend who lodge robbers in hotel to rob Ede Poly students of 30 assorted phones

The panel said over-voting was established in 744 polling units and deducted the excess votes from the votes garnered by Adeleke and Oyetola.

But in a minority judgement delivered by another member of the panel, Justice A. Ogbuli, he dismissed APC’s petition and upheld Adeleke’s victory at the poll.

Also in the Notice of Appeal signed by counsel to INEC, Prof. Paul Ananaba (SAN) and 17 others, the Commission challenged the decision of the Tribunal on the grounds that the panel erred in law by claiming that Adeleke did not score the majority of the lawful votes, saying the petitioners only called two witnesses who did not prove that the PDP candidate did not win the election.

The INEC also said the Tribunal erred in law by using a table contained in the final written address of the petitioners to determine over-voting and deducted votes scored by the respondent.

READ ALSO:. Woman rain curses on Emefiele over hardship on Naira scarcity (VIDEO)

The electoral body also dismissed the Tribunal’s claim that because it issued different accreditation reports, its conduct was tantamount to tampering with official documents.

It also said the allegation that it tampered with the official records was a criminal allegation that must be proved beyond reasonable doubt, noting that there was no proof that it tampered with any records before the panel.

We lost hundreds of our individual and group contacts recently, if you are involved, kindly send your name and location to our WhatsApp No. 09069473894, add us to your group for our news updates. IGNORE if you’re already with us*